Recently, Murray Rudd of the University of York, UK did a survey to find out what conservation scientists thought of the idea. Turns out that 60% of scientists were in favour of some sort of triage system that might see some of the most endangered charismatic species put on palliative care until they breathe their last. Though specific species weren't named, one might guess at some of the species that might be included, they'd be the really rare ones that cost a lot to maintain—giant pandas, tigers, Javan rhinoceroses perhaps... And perhaps this week's animal, Eurynorhynchus pygmeus (the spoonbilled sandpiper).

For the large part, these birds look like most other waders (small, brown, speckled, and indistinguishable to non-serious birders), but their odd spatulate bill used to filter small invertebrates from silt in shallow water sets them apart.
And herein lies the problem with a conservation triage scenario—people, including scientists, care more about certain things than others. Your passionate bird conservationists will want to save the spoon billed sandpiper, your tiger conservationist the tiger, whereas your scuba diver will probably want to protect coral reefs and let the sandpipers shuffle off to the last post. Triage might be a rational idea, but I guess consensus might be difficult to achieve.
No comments:
Post a Comment